"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama on Friday lifted restrictions on U.S. government funding for groups that provide abortion services or counseling abroad, reversing a policy of his Republican predecessor George W. Bush, a spokesman said."
With all of the significant issues on the table for our new President what could be more important and pressing of an issue than throwing billions of our tax payers dollars to aid irresponsible women kill their unborn children. Is that part of the great "Hope" campaign? Who exactly are we giving hope to?
Let's just briefly break it down. President Ronald Reagan placed the ban of tax payer dollars going to groups that advocate and perform abortions. This was known as the Mexico City Policy of 1984. I completely agree with congress in 1997 when they stated; "This vote is about taxpayer funding of abortions in other countries and of lobbying other countries to overturn their pro-life laws. Any claim to the contrary is intellectually dishonest...The United States has no business funding elective abortions in other countries, especially when the world opinion is that abortion should never, ever be promoted as a method of birth control; the United States has no business funding abortions in countries in violation of those countries laws; the United States has no business paying for organizations to pressure countries to adopt pro-abortion laws in violation of the deeply held cultural and religious beliefs of their citizenry."
On 1993-JAN-22, his second day in office, President Bill Clinton rescinded the executive order. Democrats just can't wait to aid those who wish to murder their off-spring and spend millions to other countries in the process.
On 2001-JAN-22, during his second day in office, President George W. Bush reinstated the funding ban for family planning programs run by agencies that also provide abortion services out of their own funds. However, On 2003-JAN-28, President George W Bush announced his AIDS relief plan for Africa and the Caribbean in his JAN-28 State of the Union address. The proposal is to authorize the distribution of $15 billion dollars over the next five years to 12 African countries, Haiti, and Guyana -- nations with some of the highest rates of AIDS infection. The money would not fund abortions or abortion counseling. However it would go to some non-governmental organizations which also have additional, unfunded, programs which provide abortion counseling. An anonymous senior White House aide said: "Any agency that provides treatment for AIDS will get the money - as long as none of the funds are used for family planning purposes or for abortions - except in cases of rape, incest or when the life of the mother is in danger.
So, Bush addressed the "excuse/complaint" that other health care needs for women could not be provided because of the lack of funding to organizations that offer abortion services as well. As if these companies went without. The European Union, the UK, Sweden and Switzerland all increased funding to make up the difference when the US refused to fund the murder of innocents.
One of the largest anti-responsibility, abortion pushing, plan to get out of parenting groups; Ironically named Planned Parenting, is a billion dollar company and doesn't need the aid.
"With the stroke of a pen, President Obama has lifted the stranglehold on women's health across the globe," Cecile Richards, the group's president, said in a statement.
"No longer will health care providers be forced to choose between receiving family planning funding and restricting the health care services they provide to women."
Two things. When did getting pregnant "stranglehold" a woman's health? Isn't that a natural thing? Second, when was it ever a choice of a health care provider to choose between helping life or ending life? All they simply needed to do was protect life, rather than end life and they would have all the funding they needed.
Why do liberals seek so strongly to end the life of innocent unborn children? How do they hypocritically state that they are for the people yet they do not defend those who can't defend themselves, those who haven't made their choices? How do some of them, as Obama claims, that they are Christian yet they seek to end what GOD has created. They hide under the guise that women won't get care unless... or that women should have the right to choose, "it's her body"... well, there is massive amounts of care and charity available, it is they who refuse to accept the aid. Women do have the right to choose. They can choose to be responsible and make the choice to avoid having sex or unprotected sex. You just can't become pregnant all on your own. And yes, we can argue the small percentage of women who are raped or who's life could be in dangered. There are reasonable and RESPONSIBLE exceptions to this issue.
Liberals cried from the rooftops that our President and soldiers were mass murderers for going after those that attacked us and killed thousands of innocent people or who mean to do us harm. Those who made choices to be evil. So I say to our President, who apparently does not value life, that you are directly responsible in aiding the murder of thousands of our Father in Heaven's children. I am so proud of our President. Please do not disgrace my beliefs by claiming to be a Christian.
Btw... it is legal in the US to abort the fetus in the picture above... cause you know... "it's" not really a living person.
Ref. http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_wrld.htm
Recent Comments